0

votes

Who is more Paleo: Obama or Mitt?

Answered on September 12, 2014
Created September 01, 2012 at 7:05 PM

I'm on the fence. Convince me!

61844af1187e745e09bb394cbd28cf23

(11058)

on September 01, 2012
at 09:21 PM

Why do you want a socialist to continue as commander in chief of a country in which you don't live? How could that possibly benefit you?

892d177f50b16f118152219229870e4e

(776)

on September 01, 2012
at 09:01 PM

"Expected more from this community". You shouldn't have.

0a9ad4e577fe24a6b8aafa1dd7a50c79

(5150)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:55 PM

Obama = grain-fed CAFO meat. Romney = Unrefrigerated Crisco

5ae48230df3b05bb8f210405f75fc8ed

(153)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:50 PM

Oh, don't get me wrong, I am no republican. But regardless, I don't think a lack of intelligence means something isn't paleo. Are you saying cavemen were all smarter than all republicans? I met an intelligent republican once!

F5a0ddffcf9ef5beca864050f090a790

(15515)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:47 PM

Don't worry, they will close the question soon so ... enjoy while it lasts. Disagreements in politics are normal and it is healthy to have them.

5ae48230df3b05bb8f210405f75fc8ed

(153)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:42 PM

As I said in my answer, eating Obama would be more paleo--Romney is so plastic.

F5a0ddffcf9ef5beca864050f090a790

(15515)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:39 PM

I <3 U. Great answer!!!

F5a0ddffcf9ef5beca864050f090a790

(15515)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:38 PM

I would not eat Romney even if he would be the last piece of meat on earth. I would rather eat dirt/$#!t or cockroaches. The republican party are not more Paleo, because most of them lack intelligence and education (I am not being mean, there are studies to back it up - it is totally biological).

32f5749fa6cf7adbeb0b0b031ba82b46

(41757)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:29 PM

Yes, voting to close. And neither are paleo, neither are at all desirable in any way.

  • 8838443ac82e9f98e4ae9daf80d50eb5

    asked by

    (896)
  • Views
    779
  • Last Activity
    1259D AGO
Frontpage book

Get FREE instant access to our Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!

7 Answers

8
0e687980cc3aaa0464ecc64b16add194

on September 01, 2012
at 07:37 PM

Given that the Mormon Word of Wisdom recommends eating meat sparingly, and Mrs. Obama started a White House vegetable garden, I'm going with Obama.

F5a0ddffcf9ef5beca864050f090a790

(15515)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:39 PM

I <3 U. Great answer!!!

6
Ef9f83cb4e1826261a44c173f733789e

on September 01, 2012
at 07:23 PM

Eating either would be equally paleo.

5ae48230df3b05bb8f210405f75fc8ed

(153)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:42 PM

As I said in my answer, eating Obama would be more paleo--Romney is so plastic.

0a9ad4e577fe24a6b8aafa1dd7a50c79

(5150)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:55 PM

Obama = grain-fed CAFO meat. Romney = Unrefrigerated Crisco

5
F5a0ddffcf9ef5beca864050f090a790

(15515)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:27 PM

Before they close this question (and they will, it is against the rules) - YES WE CAN!!! FORWARD!!! MITT ROMNEY IS A F***ING SCHMUCK! GO, OBAMA!!!

Okay, now I have said my peace and I can get suspended now :)

61844af1187e745e09bb394cbd28cf23

(11058)

on September 01, 2012
at 09:21 PM

Why do you want a socialist to continue as commander in chief of a country in which you don't live? How could that possibly benefit you?

2
5ae48230df3b05bb8f210405f75fc8ed

(153)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:34 PM

Well. I think that, in general, the republican party is more paleo, simply because of the smaller government issue. And Carl, I think eating Obama would be more paleo--after all, Romney is so plastic.

F5a0ddffcf9ef5beca864050f090a790

(15515)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:38 PM

I would not eat Romney even if he would be the last piece of meat on earth. I would rather eat dirt/$#!t or cockroaches. The republican party are not more Paleo, because most of them lack intelligence and education (I am not being mean, there are studies to back it up - it is totally biological).

5ae48230df3b05bb8f210405f75fc8ed

(153)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:50 PM

Oh, don't get me wrong, I am no republican. But regardless, I don't think a lack of intelligence means something isn't paleo. Are you saying cavemen were all smarter than all republicans? I met an intelligent republican once!

1
Ae8946707ddebf0f0bfbcfc63276d823

(9402)

on September 01, 2012
at 08:08 PM

Maybe the question is which is more likely to eliminate or reduce grain subsidies? Republicans?

0
2336245491a87ee15d4fb8f8f8283909

(1173)

on September 01, 2012
at 08:33 PM

Both are friends of big corporations, like Monsanto....There is no way I could support either of these men and live with myself.

0
05bd09d478a6c607b620abcd43156216

(8)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:44 PM

Wow- sorta surprised to see this stuff here. Like the rest of the world I suppose. I'm an idiot to those I disagree with... So and so is a f-ing this or that. No wonder this country has gone to shit. Expected more from this community. Perhaps I am an idiot.

892d177f50b16f118152219229870e4e

(776)

on September 01, 2012
at 09:01 PM

"Expected more from this community". You shouldn't have.

F5a0ddffcf9ef5beca864050f090a790

(15515)

on September 01, 2012
at 07:47 PM

Don't worry, they will close the question soon so ... enjoy while it lasts. Disagreements in politics are normal and it is healthy to have them.

Answer Question


Get FREE instant access to our
Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!