1

votes

[META] Can we take a fresh look at the BADGE awards?

Commented on March 22, 2011
Created March 22, 2011 at 5:24 PM

Oh boy. I hope I don't ruffle too many feathers with this one. I have no idea who put these requirements on here, but I want to immediately say that in no way do my recommendations here intend to demean or undermine their works. I'm pretty sure that when these were made, how difficult and/or how simple they would be to attain was largely unknown and therefore the requirements were sort of 'guestimations' at the time of their ingenuity.

This is not meant to be a comprehensive look, but I did pick out a few that I think need to be tweaked. Of all the ones I chose, only one has been acheived. (Famous Question has a " x 1") There could be more of them, but here are my recommendations below. Again, I certainly mean no disrespect to the person/people who came up with these qualifications.

That being said, am I out of line for suggesting a new peek at them? It would seem that I am trying to revamp the whole voting system with my last question and this one, but actually I'm just throwin this out there for all to ponder. Obviously, PaleoHacks has the potential to continue to grow and become more popular, therefore making some of these more attainable in the future. My ideas below were made even with that possibility in mind.

Anybody have additional comments / shared viewpoints / complete disagreements?

alt text

93f44e8673d3ea2294cce085ebc96e13

(10502)

on March 22, 2011
at 05:28 PM

Jack --- I am working on some changes to Paleohacks. Hit me with an email about stuff you would like to see. Thanks.

  • Af1d286f0fd5c3949f59b4edf4d892f5

    asked by

    (18472)
  • Views
    818
  • Last Activity
    2679D AGO
Frontpage book

Get FREE instant access to our Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!

0 Answers

Answer Question


Get FREE instant access to our
Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!