I was just watching the morning ABC News and they had a guest on, Dr. Michael Mosley, it was his first US interview.
From what it sounds like, it eases folks into intermittent dieting. He says 2 days of fasting are optimal and you eat 500 cal a day for women and 600 cal a day for men on the fasting days.
Has anyone read his book? Any thoughts or opinions?
asked bytypeogirl (248)
Get FREE instant access to our Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!
on March 19, 2013
at 03:19 PM
This basically seems like EatStopEat but with 500 or 500 calories instead of a complete fast. The basis is: IF YOU RESTRICT CALORIES, YOU WILL LOSE WEIGHT. Restrict big 2 days/week + eat normal the other days = overall calorie restriction for the week.
Health benefits would coincide with those of fasting because your body gets a chance to rest and sort of "clear out" with only 500 or 600 calories, although a true fast brings the benefits of autophagy (controversial I know). Weight loss also contributes to many health benefits.
I would almost prefer a complete fast because once I have food, I usually want more, but that's just IMHO
on March 19, 2013
at 03:06 PM
Dr Moseley made a program for the BBC last year which started it all off - he was the Guinea pig, being close to diabetic but not especially overweight at the start (if I recall). At the end of the program he was "cured".
A copy was available on Youtube but I just looked and can't find it. It was called "Eat Fast and Live Longer". It was a very interesting and worthwhile hour so if you can find a copy take a look - there's bound to be one somewhere.
As far as the concept goes it made sense to me - we wouldn't always have had the option to eat x normal calorie meals a day, every day, year in year out so it's not abnormal.
The 2 fasting days are non consecutive and 5/600 calories each. 5/600 calories is quite a lot really - especially if you were to use them on eggs.
My 71 y/o neighbour does it now and his blood pressure dropped significantly enough that he could reduce his meds.