0

votes

Canned salmon vs. Alaskan pollock

Answered on August 19, 2014
Created September 28, 2012 at 10:54 PM

Which one is better in terms of omega 3, toxins, nutrients, price? Wild Alaskan Keta salmon canned with bpa or wild Alaskan Pollock preserved with salt

194d8e8140425057fe06202e1e5822a7

(3979)

on April 27, 2013
at 10:19 PM

Why does this thread keep popping up on the front page? It's not an active discussion and no one's upvoting it...

Frontpage book

Get FREE instant access to our Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!

2 Answers

1
0b7c3e7fd96005f0b2dfd781e512fc2e

(1237)

on March 02, 2013
at 12:28 PM

Pollock and white fish in general are low in fat and omega-3. The canned salmon would be higher in omega-3. However both contain unique nutrients. I would go for the pollock personally, just 'cause I like fresh fish and (like the other person said) you can get canned salmon any time.

You can use cronometer to compare the nutrient profiles.

1
194d8e8140425057fe06202e1e5822a7

(3979)

on September 29, 2012
at 12:45 AM

Go for the pollock. That seems more special than a regular ol' can of salmon that you can have any day.

Answer Question


Get FREE instant access to our
Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!