Matt Metzgar has been writing about added oils, butter and fatty acids on his website and concludes that butter consumption is either neutral or harmful to health. Broadly, he argues that a high ratio of saturated to unsaturated fat leads to increased risk for CVD via decreases in flow-mediated dilation (I think).
Chris Kresser dismissed his criticism of butter on twitter outright but I'm wondering what Paleohacks thinks. Is there any substance? I have noticed a trend against added fats in general in the Paleosphere of recent noting Mat Lalonde's diet is entirely free of added fats (and quite low fat generally).
asked byAlec_2 (355)
Get FREE instant access to our Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!
on May 24, 2013
at 01:49 PM
I quickly read his "Why Butter is Bad - Part 1" post.
If I am not mistaken, all he did was look at this study that correlated "that consuming butter everyday for 3 weeks led to lower flow-mediated dilation." IDK, were the lifestyles of the participants looked at too? What else did these people eat? Any smokers vs non-smokers? Was the Butter grass-fed and raw or was it form some industrial-dump-of-a-dairy-farm, in which the product is full of hormones, chemicals, and anti-biotics?
I'm not too worried. Get a clean source of cream/butter, clarify it, and you've got pure, delicious milk-fat that's full of CLA.