Tr?id=708008405978544&ev=pageview&noscript=1
3

votes

No one ever mentions consuming raisins....

Answered on January 16, 2015
Created February 06, 2011 at 9:29 PM

My son loves raisin. I understand that it's a fruit and the sugar content, but I never hear anyone talk about them. Are raisins avoided for some reason I am unaware of?

6fece842bd1bcf5724f458a302a2156e

(1169)

on August 14, 2014
at 06:56 PM

Better than chocolate but I agree they are not great. I just ate 325g of them. Not wise.

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on September 07, 2013
at 01:28 AM

Most lower glycemic fruits are high fructose because fructose is low glycemic. Don't trust glycemic index for choosing healthy food. Fructose throws the scale off, it's why SAD thinks high fructose agave syrup(aka agave nectar) is healthy...sigh

9f54852ea376e8e416356f547611e052

(2957)

on December 04, 2012
at 12:32 AM

Nothing wrong with raisins (and sugar) in moderation as part of a balanced (paleo) diet. I eat 50g or so a week along with other fruit.

0bc6cbb653cdc5e82400f6da920f11eb

(19230)

on March 13, 2011
at 11:30 AM

Prunes are low in fructose compared to most dried fruit. They contain twice as much glucose as fructose. Prunes also contain sorbitol that contributes to their sweetness.

Cf5c9ba3c06cf300ae23c52778dfd317

(545)

on February 08, 2011
at 03:22 PM

I don't see why that drawn out calculation was necessary... I wasn't trying to refute your exact statement of the fructose content of raisins, I was acting to further reinforce your post in agreement... But hey, I'm "wrong".

82166cc32b6cf26de33b69f58fb583b1

on February 07, 2011
at 09:13 PM

Dental napalm ... candybar on a vine (that's from another comment) ... raisins are terrible food but they have great nicknames! :)

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:24 PM

Fructose clings more than glucose ;)

82166cc32b6cf26de33b69f58fb583b1

on February 07, 2011
at 02:59 AM

Stephen, well said! Candy bars on the vine is exactly what they are! Daniel, according to the USDA database, the sugar in raisins is almost exactly half fructose (to within four tenths of a percent). To be precise, they contain (per 100 g) 0.45 g sucrose (which is half fructose), 27.75 g free glucose, 29.68 g free fructose, and 2.70 g starch (which metabolizes to glucose). If you do the arithmetic, that comes out to 30.67 g glucose and 29.90 g fructose.

Cf5c9ba3c06cf300ae23c52778dfd317

(545)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:55 AM

Raisins are even more than half fructose! That being said, with raisins, a little goes a long way. I'll sometimes add like 1 tbsp to a curry or Indian dish. 1 pound beef with sauteed onions+garlic, garam masala, and 1 tbsp raisins is an amazing meal. The more important take-away point is don't eat them thinking you're doing yourself any favors, but a small amount as a treat or garnish isn't that bad.

Cf5c9ba3c06cf300ae23c52778dfd317

(545)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:41 AM

Raisins are not half fructose... they are more like 75% fructose!! That being said, with raisins, a little goes a long way. I'll sometimes add like 1 tbsp to a curry or Indian dish. 1 pound beef with sauteed onions+garlic, garam masala, and 1 tbsp raisins is an amazing meal.

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:36 AM

Go for berries instead, less fructose

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:36 AM

This, 10 times over, candybars on the vine

7e746be2f0e550a8cd7df881322ae705

(18701)

on February 06, 2011
at 09:42 PM

LOL. In my search for "raisins" I did find that Carl Stawicki believes they are *turds from Satan's pet rabbit* Hee! http://paleohacks.com/questions/16379/which-foods-would-you-forbid-closed#axzz1DDVMdvad

  • 22212e9ba2a041e6da6c963d4d41615a

    asked by

    (5773)
  • Views
    21.4K
  • Last Activity
    474D AGO
Frontpage book

Get FREE instant access to our Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!

16 Answers

17
82166cc32b6cf26de33b69f58fb583b1

on February 06, 2011
at 10:32 PM

Are raisins avoided for some reason I am unaware of?

Raisins should be avoided because they have astronomically high sugar levels, and half of that sugar is fructose. Fructose is toxic. The body can dispose of it safely in small amounts but larger amounts are harmful.

Raisins have more sugar for their weight than six out of six candy bars that I just looked up: Almond Joy, Krakel, Reeses, Mounds, Twizzlers, or Mr. Goodbar.

The carbs in starch and carbs in raisins are not the same. Starch (obtained from foods like potatoes and sweet potatoes) breaks down into glucose, which is healthy for us. Raisins break down into a mixture of glucose and fructose. Fructose is not healthy for us.

82166cc32b6cf26de33b69f58fb583b1

on February 07, 2011
at 02:59 AM

Stephen, well said! Candy bars on the vine is exactly what they are! Daniel, according to the USDA database, the sugar in raisins is almost exactly half fructose (to within four tenths of a percent). To be precise, they contain (per 100 g) 0.45 g sucrose (which is half fructose), 27.75 g free glucose, 29.68 g free fructose, and 2.70 g starch (which metabolizes to glucose). If you do the arithmetic, that comes out to 30.67 g glucose and 29.90 g fructose.

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:36 AM

This, 10 times over, candybars on the vine

Cf5c9ba3c06cf300ae23c52778dfd317

(545)

on February 08, 2011
at 03:22 PM

I don't see why that drawn out calculation was necessary... I wasn't trying to refute your exact statement of the fructose content of raisins, I was acting to further reinforce your post in agreement... But hey, I'm "wrong".

Cf5c9ba3c06cf300ae23c52778dfd317

(545)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:55 AM

Raisins are even more than half fructose! That being said, with raisins, a little goes a long way. I'll sometimes add like 1 tbsp to a curry or Indian dish. 1 pound beef with sauteed onions+garlic, garam masala, and 1 tbsp raisins is an amazing meal. The more important take-away point is don't eat them thinking you're doing yourself any favors, but a small amount as a treat or garnish isn't that bad.

Cf5c9ba3c06cf300ae23c52778dfd317

(545)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:41 AM

Raisins are not half fructose... they are more like 75% fructose!! That being said, with raisins, a little goes a long way. I'll sometimes add like 1 tbsp to a curry or Indian dish. 1 pound beef with sauteed onions+garlic, garam masala, and 1 tbsp raisins is an amazing meal.

9f54852ea376e8e416356f547611e052

(2957)

on December 04, 2012
at 12:32 AM

Nothing wrong with raisins (and sugar) in moderation as part of a balanced (paleo) diet. I eat 50g or so a week along with other fruit.

9
9f8111d9ecaa64ea098a0860b47300e0

on February 07, 2011
at 07:40 PM

My Dentist refers to raisins as "Dental Napalm"

82166cc32b6cf26de33b69f58fb583b1

on February 07, 2011
at 09:13 PM

Dental napalm ... candybar on a vine (that's from another comment) ... raisins are terrible food but they have great nicknames! :)

4
100fd85230060e754fc13394eee6d6f1

(18676)

on February 07, 2011
at 04:18 AM

Not only are they boluses of sugar, but they (and other dried fruits, including fruit roll-ups) cling to the teeth way more than most other sugar sources. My children's dentist routinely advocates against them.

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:24 PM

Fructose clings more than glucose ;)

4
1d952d225819b0229e93160a90bf9bf8

on February 07, 2011
at 12:08 AM

They probably should be treated like any other dried fruit..only for very active people with no insulin issues, and enjoyed in small amounts.

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on February 07, 2011
at 02:36 AM

Go for berries instead, less fructose

3
7e746be2f0e550a8cd7df881322ae705

on February 06, 2011
at 09:32 PM

I don't think they are avoided any more than any other type of dried fruit. In fact, last week they were suggested as a great, easily carried snack for a diabetic to carry around, just in case of a needed sugar boost. I can't find the thread now, of course.

7e746be2f0e550a8cd7df881322ae705

(18701)

on February 06, 2011
at 09:42 PM

LOL. In my search for "raisins" I did find that Carl Stawicki believes they are *turds from Satan's pet rabbit* Hee! http://paleohacks.com/questions/16379/which-foods-would-you-forbid-closed#axzz1DDVMdvad

2
8f4ff12a53a98f3b5814cfe242de0daa

(1075)

on March 13, 2011
at 01:55 AM

The sugar is the main concern.

As an alternative, I would suggest dried plums (aka prunes). They have a significantly lower glycemic load, and any impact they have will be more moderate. They tend to be preserved with potassium.... so I don't really think that is an issue.

Although I would not be to concerned with raisins if your being moderate.

4b97e3bb2ee4a9588783f5d56d687da1

(22923)

on September 07, 2013
at 01:28 AM

Most lower glycemic fruits are high fructose because fructose is low glycemic. Don't trust glycemic index for choosing healthy food. Fructose throws the scale off, it's why SAD thinks high fructose agave syrup(aka agave nectar) is healthy...sigh

0bc6cbb653cdc5e82400f6da920f11eb

(19230)

on March 13, 2011
at 11:30 AM

Prunes are low in fructose compared to most dried fruit. They contain twice as much glucose as fructose. Prunes also contain sorbitol that contributes to their sweetness.

1
5de2fffda92c0bf2be7ede10cad55546

(1781)

on March 14, 2011
at 06:48 AM

I had to take the two grandkids, 7 and 10 to an appointment with me as I was babysitting and no one else was available. Unbeknown to me they brought along a zip lock bag of raisins for a "snack" (how I hate that word), anyway after about half an hour of steadily increasing volume they were off their trees! Virtually uncontrollable, boy was I glad to get home and give them back to their mother who just shrugged and said, "yeah, they do that". Ug, wouldn't have them in the house! (The rasins, not the GK's)

1
Medium avatar

(3024)

on February 07, 2011
at 05:25 AM

If you are going to buy raisins or other dried fruit, best to look for the type with no added sugar. Dried fruit also have sulfates in them as a preservative. I'm not sure if the ones with added sugar do too.

I'd buy the most natural version I can find and keep it down to an occasional treat.

1
Bdcb2101fd3f1853cfd645094d8ad086

on February 06, 2011
at 10:22 PM

The only reason to avoid them is that gram for gram they are just about pure sugar. So it's ridiculously easy to throw off your macronutrient ratios by eating raisins.

1
Fe535c4994ac6176f76e1ff6d29eb08a

on February 06, 2011
at 09:37 PM

I would treat them just as any other fruit, and look at the numbers. Of course, I think it all depends on what type of paleo you are. If youre low-carb plaeo, I would cut them out completely, they really are just little balls of sugar. However, if you are allowing yourself some natural carbs, potatoes and frutis and such, then they would seem fine.

0
9a5e2da94ad63ea3186dfa494e16a8d1

on January 16, 2015
at 02:56 PM

When my nephew was about 4 or 5 he went a long period, like almost a year, where almost the only thing he ate was raisins and milk.  He was a picky eater (still is today at age 19) but this was verging on an eating disorder.

Part of the problem was that raisins were viewed as "healthy" so his parents were willing to give them to him all the time, but what they were doing was like giving beer to a drunkard. Raisins do have some nutrients but as others have noted they are sugar bombs, more sugary than candy, and it's all fructose, which in my opinion is among the worst sugars.  Kids love them because they're sweet but they spoil their appetite and they may be slower to develop a taste for other foods.

I think raisins are better as a dessert than a "snack".  The agricultural companies want you to believe that they're a snack and they package them in cute little boxes so you can more readily feed them to kids but I would not be fooled.

0
6665c15fa374ed28c28e2537d9aebe66

on July 09, 2013
at 09:07 PM

They add HUGE amounts of added sugar in them to.

0
0b7c3e7fd96005f0b2dfd781e512fc2e

(1232)

on December 03, 2012
at 11:19 PM

I'd be less worried about the sugar/fructose content and more about the vegetable oil that is often added to them. I don't think I've ever come across a packet of raisins without this added ingredient!

0
6fece842bd1bcf5724f458a302a2156e

on December 03, 2012
at 10:00 PM

As a sugar addict I have often abused raisins - probably no one on the planet can eat as many as I can at one sitting, sadly.

0
0345ffba8367a10facfb56be553819d0

on September 17, 2011
at 04:07 PM

I was looking up the fructose content on raisins and found your site. I mix raisins and kefir from raw goats milk in mason jars to help absorb some of the sugar. I haven't seen any research on this as to how effective it is. I'm sure the longer the fermenting process is allowed the better but again haven't found any data on that either. I keep the jars in the frig which slows the fermenting process. Based on the info here it looks like raisins may be better off avoided altogether. I eat kefired raisins just because I enjoy them.

0
Fffd8c05dded52ca60a059414d8c40fe

on August 08, 2011
at 04:05 AM

It's specific to your body needs I would say.

IF your not diabetic and your specific diet allows for a higher fructose count than say, somebody who is trying to loose weight, I'd say go for it. Although try to get the ones with no sugar or preservatives added.

My personal favorite spin on Ants on the Log, 3 inch slices of celery covered with almond butter and topped with a minimal amount of raisins. The tasty dried grapes are key, don't sacrifice deliciousness.

Answer Question


Get FREE instant access to our
Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!