My aunt tested "positive abnormal" on Antinuclear Antibodies Direct. However, the doctor (hepatologist) failed to follow through and we have no idea which particular antibodies are responsible (e.g., RNP antibodies, Smith anbitodies, Sjogren's SS-A/B, etc.).
When I myself tested positive, my neurologist tracked it down and was able to pinpoint Sjogren's Anti-SS-B as the offending antiboddy. This resulted in my diagnosis of Sjogren's Syndrome. Going through my lab works, I now realize that I tested positive on "Antinuclear Direct" a year earlier on my nephrologist's blood order. He never followed through with it either.
When I tried to have the hepatologist follow through, she remarked that it doesn't seem to be causing problems and she could go see a rheumatologist if she's inclined. (My aunt also happens to suffer from chronic hepatitis B contracted early in life -- my understanding is that this too could be an autoimmune disease: could she be testing positive for this, then?)
Now, my question is, does testing "positive abnormal" on Antinuclear Direct imply a particular type of autoimmunity? Shouldn't she, for example, go see an endocrinologist instead, as she is 70 years old and seems to have mild, thyroid-related (rather than connective-tissue related) symptoms: fatigue, fungal toenails, etc.?
If you have Hashimoto's or Ulcerative Colitis, you would not test positive on ANA Direct? Is that only for connective-tissue related autoimmune conditions (RA, Sjogren's, Lupus)
asked byNamby_Pamby (5147)
Get FREE instant access to our Paleo For Beginners Guide & 15 FREE Recipes!
on May 18, 2011
at 06:49 PM
Not much to add here:
ANA is a pretty non-specific test, more for screening than diagnostic. Testing "positive abnormal" doesn't really tell you very much, and definitely doesn't "imply a particular type of autoimmunity". It just means that your aunt is producing an abnormally high number of anti-nuclear antibodies and you need to do more testing.
As for the specific type of autoimmunity [ie, connective tissue vs GI vs thyroid, etc], I believe a positive ANA is found in all of these, as well as other conditions like cancers and infections. The test is most commonly assoc with ruling out a Lupus diagnosis - if you test negative on ANA, it's very unlikely you have Lupus.
As with anything autoimmune-related, the key is finding the right MD. This is generally not going to be diagnosed and treated in the typical 10 min appt.
on May 19, 2011
at 01:56 AM
@tartare--I can't seem to add another comment. I have had the "typical" follow up lab work done many times--the ones identified in the original question--and they are always negative. I was told that the usual scenario when a person has a positive ANA is that they DO run the "usual suspect" lab work. I'm thinking that the doctor must have suspected something, though, to even run the ANA in the first place. I'm not a doctor, though, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt! My husband is convinced they will one day stamp a lupus dx on me--I hope he is wrong, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if he turned out to be right. I tend not to be too much of a hypochondriac, but I have had very little success in getting doctors to listen to me re: symptoms that indicate/suggest auto-immune dysfunction.
on May 18, 2011
at 03:53 AM
Bummer none of our usual suspects have addressed this question yet. Maybe your question could be whittled down a bit, but its a good question about the ANA Test.
I myself tested positive for ANA but they told me "they couldn't figure out why the titer was so low". I was not wholly Paleo at the time, but pretty close and certainly on a high fat diet. Another doctor sort of shrugged it off as "well maybe you could have subclinical lupus, but.. if it's not causing you a problem, well then... (then he just trailed off)" Well then i guess he was implying it s not too big a deal if its subclinical lupus. Get sicker and call me in the morning...
Anyways, i digress, and back to your question, it's my understanding from tenuous interweb research that both frequent "false positives" happen for ANA and also that people can sort of temporarily test positive for ANA based on a temporary condition. In other words, it seems to me that the ANA test is not really the end all be all, and certainly doesn't specify a particular autoimmune disease. That said, my Mom has both vitiligo and makes antibodies specifically for her T3 thyroid hormone (is that what would be considered Hashimoto's? couldn't tell if Hashimoto's was destruction of the hormones via antibodies or destruction of the glandular organ, the thyroid, itself - if anyone could clarify this seemingly basic point i would very much appreciate it.), so maybe my positive is a genetic inheritance? It does not seem that ANA specifies for particulars when it comes to autoimmune, but I would say the elimination of gluten, sugar and starchy carbs would pretty much help any autoimmune issue. Also, going to see an endocrinologist as a 70 year old woman seems a smart course of action to me!